Lies, damn lies, and John David McGough

Well, it seems to be true that registration complaints come primarily from hamvoip as we seldom see those problems on this list. I think that’s because the Pi crowd tends to turn off their nodes way more often than others. It does take a while for the IP address of recently powered up nodes propagate. Hamvoip fixed that but won’t share the code so it might look like ASL registration is broken to some.

VE2PF’s theory of “the other distro playing with registration” isn’t so far fetched. In fact, there’s a whole lot of truth to that.

···

Tim WD6AWP

The AllStar branding did come later.

The AllStar brand started when the infrastructure (portal, registration, IP distribution and ham network) came to be as embodied in allstarlink.org. Back then AllStar was the ham network and app_rpt was the Asterisk application. I still like that delineation because anyone can use app_rpt (such as GMRS) but only hams can use the AllStar network.

Water under the bridge, it’s all AllStar now.

···

Tim WD6AWP

Zapatelephony predates both app_rpt and Asterisk. Asterisk and app_rpt are based on concepts presented on the Zapatelephony web site. This bit of history is not well understood but Todd Lesser (who’s name in on that site and is a current AllStar board member) was there through it all. That Zapatelephony site is about the circuit board. Read the whole http://zapatatelephony.org web site, not just the one page taken out of context.

The Zapatelephony circuit board was released under public domain to lower the cost of PBX creation. Asterisk and app_rpt have been open source since day one. There is no question about that any “proof” to the contrary is plainly wrong.

···

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 3:11 PM David McGough kb4fxc@inttek.net wrote:

Joshua,

I am now restating FACTS which have been presented multiple times. While

various persons will quickly try and dispute these statements, to this

date, NO ONE has provided ANY LEGAL PROOF that this information isn’t

truth. There continues to be plenty of hearsay and “oh, it’s all GPL2”

comments.

The fact is that I firmly believe that app_rpt and some related software

are dedicated to the public domain, as is stated in this document which

was on the “official” Zapata Telephony website from 2005 through 2016.

See the fine print at the bottom of this document:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160315124205/http://zapatatelephony.org/Rpt_Flow.pdf

AllStar Link Inc (ASL) is an organization which formed after Jim Dixon

died INTESTATE (he had no will). I have not been presented with any PROOF

that ASL has LEGAL ownership of ANYTHING related to Jim Dixon’s estate.

While various persons will quickly dispute this statement with hearsay, NO

ONE has provided ANY LEGAL PROOF that this information isn’t truth.

If you wish to lookup Jim Dixon’s probate case, the case number is:

17STPB08347

Go to this website and search for the case number:

http://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/index.aspx?casetype=probate

As a matter of record, no HamVoIP code comes from any ASL source (e.g.

github). Our codebase pre-dates ASL’s existence.

So, there isn’t any “face to lose.” The HamVoIP team has done nothing

wrong. My earlier post, which is at the bottom of this message, is simply

a response to the stupidity of implications being made by others.

Enough said, I’ve got other more important fish to fry. Now let the flames

(hearsay) fly.

73, David KB4FXC

On Fri, 5 Jul 2019, Joshua Nulton wrote:

John don’t go so far as to lose the dignity. Many of us in both aisles

respect you both as developers even though we don’t agree with this move.

You’re now making jokes about something serious and most who understand the

deeper issues know it is not a laughing matter, as a developer you know

this too.

I am not bashing you guys. I know you guys have good intentions. Doug too

is a good man. You have made Pi specific improvements, you know VoIP

networking very well (probably better than the ASL team) and your team

offers TONS of support to the public. But those of us who know software

(yourself included) also know you are not doing the right thing.

Forking software is one thing, and is acceptable, but that is not what was

done. You can not take open source software and brand it as your own

proprietary product, released as a package or not. I am sure you feel a

deep connection to it after all the years you’ve put into it, but it was

not yours to foster in the first place. Worse than that you are trying to

fork the entire community. It is getting ugly and you could fix it all so

easily. Your improvements are good, so commit it to master, take the credit

for it and be done with what could get nasty. Don’t lose face on this. It

was a gift to all of us on the condition that it remain open, it really is

that simple. Have some respect for Jim and the team that gave us this gift.

Please just do the right thing and let’s put this behind us.

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 2:49 PM Robert Ruddy bob@ruddy.net wrote:

100% agree with everything you said.

Bob

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 13:37 Steve L kb9mwr@gmail.com wrote:

I won’t go so far as to suggest there could be something nefarious in

the compiled hamvoip code. That is something that really on concerns

me with big corporations like Sony Rootkit scandal. Here we just have

two groups of people who don’t see eye-to eye.

The bigger problem is the folks (user base/end users) that don’t see

the benefit of open source

Well I will share the reason I moved to Allstar (or more specifically

App_rpt at the time, because I think the Allstar branding came later)

from the IRLP platform was IRLP suffered the same lack of source

issues. And I am no appliance operator. I can only be satisfied so

long being and end user. I wanted to modify things, change things

that that the closed IRLP platform wouldn’t allow me to. Allstar

became the answer to my prayers.

Sure Hamvoip can be a good place to start, but if you are like many

you will be unsatisfied at some point later. Then there is the whole

what happens if some dies (like Jim did) or pulls the plug? In an

opensource environment, the project can live on, like it has. In the

closed source case, not so much.

Same reasons I moved away from DD-WRT (no source code) and favored Tomato.

Same reason AMBE bugs the heck out of me…

Aside from a good number of documents that the Hamvoip guy have out

there, I don’t see how the project gives back to the community, other

than by providing something geared for appliance folks.

Ham radio is and always has been a work together thing.

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:07 PM David McGough kb4fxc@inttek.net wrote:

You forgot to mention that “secret spy” software included in the HamVoIP

release is designed to dampen the Sun’s double-oscillator, throwing it

completely out of phase. With each new HamVoIP node deployed, the effect

becomes more pronounced, ultimately causing a Maunder Sunspot Minimum.

This, of course, is to the HamVoIP advantage, since no sunspots means

even

more hams will need AllStar for communications. Which, in turn, dampens

the Sun even more.

A movie is already in production. In this remake of the classic 1962

thriller “Dr. No,” SPECTRE is replaced SPARKY, AKA: John David McGough,

as

the Arch villain (running Arch Linux, of course). In a twist of the plot

from the original movie, SKYNET is accidentally created by huge

Raspberry

Pi cluster, leading to world domination.

…LMAO…

73, David KB4FXC


App_rpt-users mailing list

App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org

http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”

You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.


Tim WD6AWP

I asked Todd to comment on this. He has done so here: https://community.allstarlink.org/t/history-of-zapata-telephony-asterisk-allstar-and-app-rpt-open-source/15162

···

Tim WD6AWP

Seems pretty clear to me. It seemed pretty clear to me when V1.5RC was released a couple years ago and I, among others, asked about why the source was not forthcoming. The reasons seem to change somewhat every so often. I’d have to look at the original email, but it definitely didn’t mention any belief that app_rpt or anything related was public domain.

Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
Email: buddy@brannan.name
Mobile: (814) 431-0962

···

On Jul 7, 2019, at 2:59 PM, Tim Sawyer <tisawyer@gmail.com> wrote:

I asked Todd to comment on this. He has done so here: History of Zapata Telephony, Asterisk, Allstar and app_rpt open source

On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 9:56 AM Tim Sawyer <tisawyer@gmail.com> wrote:
Zapatelephony predates both app_rpt and Asterisk. Asterisk and app_rpt are based on concepts presented on the Zapatelephony web site. This bit of history is not well understood but Todd Lesser (who's name in on that site and is a current AllStar board member) was there through it all. That Zapatelephony site is about the circuit board. Read the whole http://zapatatelephony.org web site, not just the one page taken out of context.

The Zapatelephony circuit board was released under public domain to lower the cost of PBX creation. Asterisk and app_rpt have been open source since day one. There is no question about that any "proof" to the contrary is plainly wrong.

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 3:11 PM David McGough <kb4fxc@inttek.net> wrote:

Joshua,

I am now restating FACTS which have been presented multiple times. While
various persons will quickly try and dispute these statements, to this
date, NO ONE has provided ANY LEGAL PROOF that this information isn't
truth. There continues to be plenty of hearsay and "oh, it's all GPL2"
comments.

The fact is that I firmly believe that app_rpt and some related software
are dedicated to the public domain, as is stated in this document which
was on the "official" Zapata Telephony website from 2005 through 2016.
See the fine print at the bottom of this document:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160315124205/http://zapatatelephony.org/Rpt_Flow.pdf

AllStar Link Inc (ASL) is an organization which formed after Jim Dixon
died INTESTATE (he had no will). I have not been presented with any PROOF
that ASL has LEGAL ownership of *ANYTHING* related to Jim Dixon's estate.
While various persons will quickly dispute this statement with hearsay, NO
ONE has provided ANY LEGAL PROOF that this information isn't truth.

If you wish to lookup Jim Dixon's probate case, the case number is:
17STPB08347

Go to this website and search for the case number:

http://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/index.aspx?casetype=probate

As a matter of record, no HamVoIP code comes from any ASL source (e.g.
github). Our codebase pre-dates ASL's existence.

So, there isn't any "face to lose." The HamVoIP team has done nothing
wrong. My earlier post, which is at the bottom of this message, is simply
a response to the stupidity of implications being made by others.

Enough said, I've got other more important fish to fry. Now let the flames
(hearsay) fly.

73, David KB4FXC

On Fri, 5 Jul 2019, Joshua Nulton wrote:

> John don't go so far as to lose the dignity. Many of us in both aisles
> respect you both as developers even though we don't agree with this move.
> You're now making jokes about something serious and most who understand the
> deeper issues know it is not a laughing matter, as a developer you know
> this too.
>
> I am not bashing you guys. I know you guys have good intentions. Doug too
> is a good man. You have made Pi specific improvements, you know VoIP
> networking very well (probably better than the ASL team) and your team
> offers TONS of support to the public. But those of us who know software
> (yourself included) also know you are not doing the right thing.
>
> Forking software is one thing, and is acceptable, but that is not what was
> done. You can not take open source software and brand it as your own
> proprietary product, released as a package or not. I am sure you feel a
> deep connection to it after all the years you've put into it, but it was
> not yours to foster in the first place. Worse than that you are trying to
> fork the entire community. It is getting ugly and you could fix it all so
> easily. Your improvements are good, so commit it to master, take the credit
> for it and be done with what could get nasty. Don't lose face on this. It
> was a gift to all of us on the condition that it remain open, it really is
> that simple. Have some respect for Jim and the team that gave us this gift.
> Please just do the right thing and let's put this behind us.
>
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 2:49 PM Robert Ruddy <bob@ruddy.net> wrote:
>
> > 100% agree with everything you said.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 13:37 Steve L <kb9mwr@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I won't go so far as to suggest there could be something nefarious in
> >> the compiled hamvoip code. That is something that really on concerns
> >> me with big corporations like Sony Rootkit scandal. Here we just have
> >> two groups of people who don't see eye-to eye.
> >>
> >> The bigger problem is the folks (user base/end users) that don't see
> >> the benefit of open source
> >>
> >> Well I will share the reason I moved to Allstar (or more specifically
> >> App_rpt at the time, because I think the Allstar branding came later)
> >> from the IRLP platform was IRLP suffered the same lack of source
> >> issues. And I am no appliance operator. I can only be satisfied so
> >> long being and end user. I wanted to modify things, change things
> >> that that the closed IRLP platform wouldn't allow me to. Allstar
> >> became the answer to my prayers.
> >>
> >> Sure Hamvoip can be a good place to start, but if you are like many
> >> you will be unsatisfied at some point later. Then there is the whole
> >> what happens if some dies (like Jim did) or pulls the plug? In an
> >> opensource environment, the project can live on, like it has. In the
> >> closed source case, not so much.
> >>
> >> Same reasons I moved away from DD-WRT (no source code) and favored Tomato.
> >>
> >> Same reason AMBE bugs the heck out of me...
> >>
> >> Aside from a good number of documents that the Hamvoip guy have out
> >> there, I don't see how the project gives back to the community, other
> >> than by providing something geared for appliance folks.
> >>
> >> Ham radio is and always has been a work together thing.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:07 PM David McGough <kb4fxc@inttek.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > You forgot to mention that "secret spy" software included in the HamVoIP
> >> > release is designed to dampen the Sun's double-oscillator, throwing it
> >> > completely out of phase. With each new HamVoIP node deployed, the effect
> >> > becomes more pronounced, ultimately causing a Maunder Sunspot Minimum.
> >> > This, of course, is to the HamVoIP advantage, since no sunspots means
> >> even
> >> > more hams will need AllStar for communications. Which, in turn, dampens
> >> > the Sun even more.
> >> >
> >> > A movie is already in production. In this remake of the classic 1962
> >> > thriller "Dr. No," SPECTRE is replaced SPARKY, AKA: John David McGough,
> >> as
> >> > the Arch villain (running Arch Linux, of course). In a twist of the plot
> >> > from the original movie, SKYNET is accidentally created by huge
> >> Raspberry
> >> > Pi cluster, leading to world domination.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ....LMAO....
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 73, David KB4FXC
> >> >
> >> >

_______________________________________________
App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or edit options button"
You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.

--
Tim WD6AWP

--
Tim WD6AWP
_______________________________________________
App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or edit options button"
You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.

1 Like

They definitely didn’t say anything about public domain and actually acknowledged on their web page that it open source! In other words, they knew it was open source when they chose to download the source code. They knew that any changes they made and redistributed that they have to release back to the community.

https://www.hamvoip.org

“Why Allstar?

We are often asked why Allstar with all of the new RF digital repeaters and their VOIP connection schemes out there. The best answer is open source, quality audio, and freedom to do what you want. Dstar, Fusion, DMR, etc are all at least partially if not completely proprietary systems…”

To make matters even worse, they now they are monetizing on all the work many people have done to make Allstar what it is today by asking for people to send them money!

I know there are some personality conflicts with Doug and some of the tech support people. I personally have tried to be the buffer and was rebuffed. There is no excuse not to release the code.

Jim Dixon would be so upset if he was alive today.
Shame on them.

1 Like

HamVoIP is calling AllStarLink illegitimate, AGAIN. They say we “hijacked” AllStarLink.

That’s complete BS! When Jim Dixon died we (Kevin Custer, Steve Zingman and myself) were contacted by two of the principal creators and supporters of AllStarLink, Steve Rodgers and David Kramer. We were tasked with keeping AllStar operational and given access to the servers. There is a email from Steve plainly stating that. Furthermore, the majority of the AllStarBoard is made up of members who worked closely, even daily, with Jim.

Here’s the post from Steve: Jim Dixon's passing, and Allstar Link transition as posted on app_rpt-users.

I don’t know how many times we have to squash the BS from HamVoIP, but I will continue to do so for as long as it takes.

2 Likes

They definitely didn’t say anything about public domain and actually acknowledged on their web page that it open source! In other words, they knew it was open source when they chose to download the source code. They knew that any changes they made and redistributed that they have to release back to the community.

https://www.hamvoip.org

“Why Allstar?

We are often asked why Allstar with all of the new RF digital repeaters and their VOIP connection schemes out there. The best answer is open source, quality audio, and freedom to do what you want. Dstar, Fusion, DMR, etc are all at least partially if not completely proprietary systems…”

To make matters even worse, they now they are monetizing on all the work many people have done to make Allstar what it is today by asking for people to send them money!

I know there are some personality conflicts with Doug and some of the tech support people. I personally have tried to be the buffer and was rebuffed. There is no excuse not to release the code.

Jim Dixon would be so upset if he was alive today.
Shame on them.

···

On Jul 7, 2019, at 17:00, Buddy Brannan buddy@brannan.name wrote:

Seems pretty clear to me. It seemed pretty clear to me when V1.5RC was released a couple years ago and I, among others, asked about why the source was not forthcoming. The reasons seem to change somewhat every so often. I’d have to look at the original email, but it definitely didn’t mention any belief that app_rpt or anything related was public domain.

Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
Email: buddy@brannan.name
Mobile: (814) 431-0962

On Jul 7, 2019, at 2:59 PM, Tim Sawyer tisawyer@gmail.com wrote:

I asked Todd to comment on this. He has done so here: History of Zapata Telephony, Asterisk, Allstar and app_rpt open source

On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 9:56 AM Tim Sawyer tisawyer@gmail.com wrote:
Zapatelephony predates both app_rpt and Asterisk. Asterisk and app_rpt are based on concepts presented on the Zapatelephony web site. This bit of history is not well understood but Todd Lesser (who’s name in on that site and is a current AllStar board member) was there through it all. That Zapatelephony site is about the circuit board. Read the whole http://zapatatelephony.org web site, not just the one page taken out of context.

The Zapatelephony circuit board was released under public domain to lower the cost of PBX creation. Asterisk and app_rpt have been open source since day one. There is no question about that any “proof” to the contrary is plainly wrong.

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 3:11 PM David McGough kb4fxc@inttek.net wrote:

Joshua,

I am now restating FACTS which have been presented multiple times. While
various persons will quickly try and dispute these statements, to this
date, NO ONE has provided ANY LEGAL PROOF that this information isn’t
truth. There continues to be plenty of hearsay and “oh, it’s all GPL2”
comments.

The fact is that I firmly believe that app_rpt and some related software
are dedicated to the public domain, as is stated in this document which
was on the “official” Zapata Telephony website from 2005 through 2016.
See the fine print at the bottom of this document:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160315124205/http://zapatatelephony.org/Rpt_Flow.pdf

AllStar Link Inc (ASL) is an organization which formed after Jim Dixon
died INTESTATE (he had no will). I have not been presented with any PROOF
that ASL has LEGAL ownership of ANYTHING related to Jim Dixon’s estate.
While various persons will quickly dispute this statement with hearsay, NO
ONE has provided ANY LEGAL PROOF that this information isn’t truth.

If you wish to lookup Jim Dixon’s probate case, the case number is:
17STPB08347

Go to this website and search for the case number:

http://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/index.aspx?casetype=probate

As a matter of record, no HamVoIP code comes from any ASL source (e.g.
github). Our codebase pre-dates ASL’s existence.

So, there isn’t any “face to lose.” The HamVoIP team has done nothing
wrong. My earlier post, which is at the bottom of this message, is simply
a response to the stupidity of implications being made by others.

Enough said, I’ve got other more important fish to fry. Now let the flames
(hearsay) fly.

73, David KB4FXC

On Fri, 5 Jul 2019, Joshua Nulton wrote:

John don’t go so far as to lose the dignity. Many of us in both aisles
respect you both as developers even though we don’t agree with this move.
You’re now making jokes about something serious and most who understand the
deeper issues know it is not a laughing matter, as a developer you know
this too.

I am not bashing you guys. I know you guys have good intentions. Doug too
is a good man. You have made Pi specific improvements, you know VoIP
networking very well (probably better than the ASL team) and your team
offers TONS of support to the public. But those of us who know software
(yourself included) also know you are not doing the right thing.

Forking software is one thing, and is acceptable, but that is not what was
done. You can not take open source software and brand it as your own
proprietary product, released as a package or not. I am sure you feel a
deep connection to it after all the years you’ve put into it, but it was
not yours to foster in the first place. Worse than that you are trying to
fork the entire community. It is getting ugly and you could fix it all so
easily. Your improvements are good, so commit it to master, take the credit
for it and be done with what could get nasty. Don’t lose face on this. It
was a gift to all of us on the condition that it remain open, it really is
that simple. Have some respect for Jim and the team that gave us this gift.
Please just do the right thing and let’s put this behind us.

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 2:49 PM Robert Ruddy bob@ruddy.net wrote:

100% agree with everything you said.

Bob

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 13:37 Steve L kb9mwr@gmail.com wrote:

I won’t go so far as to suggest there could be something nefarious in
the compiled hamvoip code. That is something that really on concerns
me with big corporations like Sony Rootkit scandal. Here we just have
two groups of people who don’t see eye-to eye.

The bigger problem is the folks (user base/end users) that don’t see
the benefit of open source

Well I will share the reason I moved to Allstar (or more specifically
App_rpt at the time, because I think the Allstar branding came later)
from the IRLP platform was IRLP suffered the same lack of source
issues. And I am no appliance operator. I can only be satisfied so
long being and end user. I wanted to modify things, change things
that that the closed IRLP platform wouldn’t allow me to. Allstar
became the answer to my prayers.

Sure Hamvoip can be a good place to start, but if you are like many
you will be unsatisfied at some point later. Then there is the whole
what happens if some dies (like Jim did) or pulls the plug? In an
opensource environment, the project can live on, like it has. In the
closed source case, not so much.

Same reasons I moved away from DD-WRT (no source code) and favored Tomato.

Same reason AMBE bugs the heck out of me…

Aside from a good number of documents that the Hamvoip guy have out
there, I don’t see how the project gives back to the community, other
than by providing something geared for appliance folks.

Ham radio is and always has been a work together thing.

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:07 PM David McGough kb4fxc@inttek.net wrote:

You forgot to mention that “secret spy” software included in the HamVoIP
release is designed to dampen the Sun’s double-oscillator, throwing it
completely out of phase. With each new HamVoIP node deployed, the effect
becomes more pronounced, ultimately causing a Maunder Sunspot Minimum.
This, of course, is to the HamVoIP advantage, since no sunspots means
even
more hams will need AllStar for communications. Which, in turn, dampens
the Sun even more.

A movie is already in production. In this remake of the classic 1962
thriller “Dr. No,” SPECTRE is replaced SPARKY, AKA: John David McGough,
as
the Arch villain (running Arch Linux, of course). In a twist of the plot
from the original movie, SKYNET is accidentally created by huge
Raspberry
Pi cluster, leading to world domination.

…LMAO…

73, David KB4FXC


App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.


Tim WD6AWP


Tim WD6AWP


App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.


App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.

Here is a direct recording from Doug Crompton on his interview on QSO today:

He states the downside of IRLP on the closed source manner, and the fact is operated by one person, and then later states the benefits of AllStar

Sounds familiar Doug??

kg0sky.duckdns.org/doug_crompton.wav

Whole interview can be found here:

https://www.qsotoday.com/podcasts/wa3dsp

···

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:58 AM todd@lesser.com todd@nccom.com wrote:

They definitely didn’t say anything about public domain and actually acknowledged on their web page that it open source! In other words, they knew it was open source when they chose to download the source code. They knew that any changes they made and redistributed that they have to release back to the community.

https://www.hamvoip.org

“Why Allstar?

We are often asked why Allstar with all of the new RF digital repeaters and their VOIP connection schemes out there. The best answer is open source, quality audio, and freedom to do what you want. Dstar, Fusion, DMR, etc are all at least partially if not completely proprietary systems…”

To make matters even worse, they now they are monetizing on all the work many people have done to make Allstar what it is today by asking for people to send them money!

I know there are some personality conflicts with Doug and some of the tech support people. I personally have tried to be the buffer and was rebuffed. There is no excuse not to release the code.

Jim Dixon would be so upset if he was alive today.
Shame on them.

On Jul 7, 2019, at 17:00, Buddy Brannan buddy@brannan.name wrote:

Seems pretty clear to me. It seemed pretty clear to me when V1.5RC was released a couple years ago and I, among others, asked about why the source was not forthcoming. The reasons seem to change somewhat every so often. I’d have to look at the original email, but it definitely didn’t mention any belief that app_rpt or anything related was public domain.

Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
Email: buddy@brannan.name
Mobile: (814) 431-0962

On Jul 7, 2019, at 2:59 PM, Tim Sawyer tisawyer@gmail.com wrote:

I asked Todd to comment on this. He has done so here: https://community.allstarlink.org/t/history-of-zapata-telephony-asterisk-allstar-and-app-rpt-open-source/15162

On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 9:56 AM Tim Sawyer tisawyer@gmail.com wrote:
Zapatelephony predates both app_rpt and Asterisk. Asterisk and app_rpt are based on concepts presented on the Zapatelephony web site. This bit of history is not well understood but Todd Lesser (who’s name in on that site and is a current AllStar board member) was there through it all. That Zapatelephony site is about the circuit board. Read the whole http://zapatatelephony.org web site, not just the one page taken out of context.

The Zapatelephony circuit board was released under public domain to lower the cost of PBX creation. Asterisk and app_rpt have been open source since day one. There is no question about that any “proof” to the contrary is plainly wrong.

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 3:11 PM David McGough kb4fxc@inttek.net wrote:

Joshua,

I am now restating FACTS which have been presented multiple times. While
various persons will quickly try and dispute these statements, to this
date, NO ONE has provided ANY LEGAL PROOF that this information isn’t
truth. There continues to be plenty of hearsay and “oh, it’s all GPL2”
comments.

The fact is that I firmly believe that app_rpt and some related software
are dedicated to the public domain, as is stated in this document which
was on the “official” Zapata Telephony website from 2005 through 2016.
See the fine print at the bottom of this document:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160315124205/http://zapatatelephony.org/Rpt_Flow.pdf

AllStar Link Inc (ASL) is an organization which formed after Jim Dixon
died INTESTATE (he had no will). I have not been presented with any PROOF
that ASL has LEGAL ownership of ANYTHING related to Jim Dixon’s estate.
While various persons will quickly dispute this statement with hearsay, NO
ONE has provided ANY LEGAL PROOF that this information isn’t truth.

If you wish to lookup Jim Dixon’s probate case, the case number is:
17STPB08347

Go to this website and search for the case number:

http://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/index.aspx?casetype=probate

As a matter of record, no HamVoIP code comes from any ASL source (e.g.
github). Our codebase pre-dates ASL’s existence.

So, there isn’t any “face to lose.” The HamVoIP team has done nothing
wrong. My earlier post, which is at the bottom of this message, is simply
a response to the stupidity of implications being made by others.

Enough said, I’ve got other more important fish to fry. Now let the flames
(hearsay) fly.

73, David KB4FXC

On Fri, 5 Jul 2019, Joshua Nulton wrote:

John don’t go so far as to lose the dignity. Many of us in both aisles
respect you both as developers even though we don’t agree with this move.
You’re now making jokes about something serious and most who understand the
deeper issues know it is not a laughing matter, as a developer you know
this too.

I am not bashing you guys. I know you guys have good intentions. Doug too
is a good man. You have made Pi specific improvements, you know VoIP
networking very well (probably better than the ASL team) and your team
offers TONS of support to the public. But those of us who know software
(yourself included) also know you are not doing the right thing.

Forking software is one thing, and is acceptable, but that is not what was
done. You can not take open source software and brand it as your own
proprietary product, released as a package or not. I am sure you feel a
deep connection to it after all the years you’ve put into it, but it was
not yours to foster in the first place. Worse than that you are trying to
fork the entire community. It is getting ugly and you could fix it all so
easily. Your improvements are good, so commit it to master, take the credit
for it and be done with what could get nasty. Don’t lose face on this. It
was a gift to all of us on the condition that it remain open, it really is
that simple. Have some respect for Jim and the team that gave us this gift.
Please just do the right thing and let’s put this behind us.

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 2:49 PM Robert Ruddy bob@ruddy.net wrote:

100% agree with everything you said.

Bob

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 13:37 Steve L kb9mwr@gmail.com wrote:

I won’t go so far as to suggest there could be something nefarious in
the compiled hamvoip code. That is something that really on concerns
me with big corporations like Sony Rootkit scandal. Here we just have
two groups of people who don’t see eye-to eye.

The bigger problem is the folks (user base/end users) that don’t see
the benefit of open source

Well I will share the reason I moved to Allstar (or more specifically
App_rpt at the time, because I think the Allstar branding came later)
from the IRLP platform was IRLP suffered the same lack of source
issues. And I am no appliance operator. I can only be satisfied so
long being and end user. I wanted to modify things, change things
that that the closed IRLP platform wouldn’t allow me to. Allstar
became the answer to my prayers.

Sure Hamvoip can be a good place to start, but if you are like many
you will be unsatisfied at some point later. Then there is the whole
what happens if some dies (like Jim did) or pulls the plug? In an
opensource environment, the project can live on, like it has. In the
closed source case, not so much.

Same reasons I moved away from DD-WRT (no source code) and favored Tomato.

Same reason AMBE bugs the heck out of me…

Aside from a good number of documents that the Hamvoip guy have out
there, I don’t see how the project gives back to the community, other
than by providing something geared for appliance folks.

Ham radio is and always has been a work together thing.

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:07 PM David McGough kb4fxc@inttek.net wrote:

You forgot to mention that “secret spy” software included in the HamVoIP
release is designed to dampen the Sun’s double-oscillator, throwing it
completely out of phase. With each new HamVoIP node deployed, the effect
becomes more pronounced, ultimately causing a Maunder Sunspot Minimum.
This, of course, is to the HamVoIP advantage, since no sunspots means
even
more hams will need AllStar for communications. Which, in turn, dampens
the Sun even more.

A movie is already in production. In this remake of the classic 1962
thriller “Dr. No,” SPECTRE is replaced SPARKY, AKA: John David McGough,
as
the Arch villain (running Arch Linux, of course). In a twist of the plot
from the original movie, SKYNET is accidentally created by huge
Raspberry
Pi cluster, leading to world domination.

…LMAO…

73, David KB4FXC


App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.


Tim WD6AWP


Tim WD6AWP


App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.


App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.


App_rpt-users mailing list

App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org

http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”

You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.

Hey that’s a good one!

···

Le mar. 9 juill. 2019 12 h 21, Skyler F electricity440@gmail.com a écrit :

Here is a direct recording from Doug Crompton on his interview on QSO today:

He states the downside of IRLP on the closed source manner, and the fact is operated by one person, and then later states the benefits of AllStar

Sounds familiar Doug??

kg0sky.duckdns.org/doug_crompton.wav

Whole interview can be found here:

https://www.qsotoday.com/podcasts/wa3dsp

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:58 AM todd@lesser.com todd@nccom.com wrote:

They definitely didn’t say anything about public domain and actually acknowledged on their web page that it open source! In other words, they knew it was open source when they chose to download the source code. They knew that any changes they made and redistributed that they have to release back to the community.

https://www.hamvoip.org

“Why Allstar?

We are often asked why Allstar with all of the new RF digital repeaters and their VOIP connection schemes out there. The best answer is open source, quality audio, and freedom to do what you want. Dstar, Fusion, DMR, etc are all at least partially if not completely proprietary systems…”

To make matters even worse, they now they are monetizing on all the work many people have done to make Allstar what it is today by asking for people to send them money!

I know there are some personality conflicts with Doug and some of the tech support people. I personally have tried to be the buffer and was rebuffed. There is no excuse not to release the code.

Jim Dixon would be so upset if he was alive today.
Shame on them.

On Jul 7, 2019, at 17:00, Buddy Brannan buddy@brannan.name wrote:

Seems pretty clear to me. It seemed pretty clear to me when V1.5RC was released a couple years ago and I, among others, asked about why the source was not forthcoming. The reasons seem to change somewhat every so often. I’d have to look at the original email, but it definitely didn’t mention any belief that app_rpt or anything related was public domain.

Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
Email: buddy@brannan.name
Mobile: (814) 431-0962

On Jul 7, 2019, at 2:59 PM, Tim Sawyer tisawyer@gmail.com wrote:

I asked Todd to comment on this. He has done so here: https://community.allstarlink.org/t/history-of-zapata-telephony-asterisk-allstar-and-app-rpt-open-source/15162

On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 9:56 AM Tim Sawyer tisawyer@gmail.com wrote:
Zapatelephony predates both app_rpt and Asterisk. Asterisk and app_rpt are based on concepts presented on the Zapatelephony web site. This bit of history is not well understood but Todd Lesser (who’s name in on that site and is a current AllStar board member) was there through it all. That Zapatelephony site is about the circuit board. Read the whole http://zapatatelephony.org web site, not just the one page taken out of context.

The Zapatelephony circuit board was released under public domain to lower the cost of PBX creation. Asterisk and app_rpt have been open source since day one. There is no question about that any “proof” to the contrary is plainly wrong.

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 3:11 PM David McGough kb4fxc@inttek.net wrote:

Joshua,

I am now restating FACTS which have been presented multiple times. While
various persons will quickly try and dispute these statements, to this
date, NO ONE has provided ANY LEGAL PROOF that this information isn’t
truth. There continues to be plenty of hearsay and “oh, it’s all GPL2”
comments.

The fact is that I firmly believe that app_rpt and some related software
are dedicated to the public domain, as is stated in this document which
was on the “official” Zapata Telephony website from 2005 through 2016.
See the fine print at the bottom of this document:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160315124205/http://zapatatelephony.org/Rpt_Flow.pdf

AllStar Link Inc (ASL) is an organization which formed after Jim Dixon
died INTESTATE (he had no will). I have not been presented with any PROOF
that ASL has LEGAL ownership of ANYTHING related to Jim Dixon’s estate.
While various persons will quickly dispute this statement with hearsay, NO
ONE has provided ANY LEGAL PROOF that this information isn’t truth.

If you wish to lookup Jim Dixon’s probate case, the case number is:
17STPB08347

Go to this website and search for the case number:

http://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/index.aspx?casetype=probate

As a matter of record, no HamVoIP code comes from any ASL source (e.g.
github). Our codebase pre-dates ASL’s existence.

So, there isn’t any “face to lose.” The HamVoIP team has done nothing
wrong. My earlier post, which is at the bottom of this message, is simply
a response to the stupidity of implications being made by others.

Enough said, I’ve got other more important fish to fry. Now let the flames
(hearsay) fly.

73, David KB4FXC

On Fri, 5 Jul 2019, Joshua Nulton wrote:

John don’t go so far as to lose the dignity. Many of us in both aisles
respect you both as developers even though we don’t agree with this move.
You’re now making jokes about something serious and most who understand the
deeper issues know it is not a laughing matter, as a developer you know
this too.

I am not bashing you guys. I know you guys have good intentions. Doug too
is a good man. You have made Pi specific improvements, you know VoIP
networking very well (probably better than the ASL team) and your team
offers TONS of support to the public. But those of us who know software
(yourself included) also know you are not doing the right thing.

Forking software is one thing, and is acceptable, but that is not what was
done. You can not take open source software and brand it as your own
proprietary product, released as a package or not. I am sure you feel a
deep connection to it after all the years you’ve put into it, but it was
not yours to foster in the first place. Worse than that you are trying to
fork the entire community. It is getting ugly and you could fix it all so
easily. Your improvements are good, so commit it to master, take the credit
for it and be done with what could get nasty. Don’t lose face on this. It
was a gift to all of us on the condition that it remain open, it really is
that simple. Have some respect for Jim and the team that gave us this gift.
Please just do the right thing and let’s put this behind us.

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 2:49 PM Robert Ruddy bob@ruddy.net wrote:

100% agree with everything you said.

Bob

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 13:37 Steve L kb9mwr@gmail.com wrote:

I won’t go so far as to suggest there could be something nefarious in
the compiled hamvoip code. That is something that really on concerns
me with big corporations like Sony Rootkit scandal. Here we just have
two groups of people who don’t see eye-to eye.

The bigger problem is the folks (user base/end users) that don’t see
the benefit of open source

Well I will share the reason I moved to Allstar (or more specifically
App_rpt at the time, because I think the Allstar branding came later)
from the IRLP platform was IRLP suffered the same lack of source
issues. And I am no appliance operator. I can only be satisfied so
long being and end user. I wanted to modify things, change things
that that the closed IRLP platform wouldn’t allow me to. Allstar
became the answer to my prayers.

Sure Hamvoip can be a good place to start, but if you are like many
you will be unsatisfied at some point later. Then there is the whole
what happens if some dies (like Jim did) or pulls the plug? In an
opensource environment, the project can live on, like it has. In the
closed source case, not so much.

Same reasons I moved away from DD-WRT (no source code) and favored Tomato.

Same reason AMBE bugs the heck out of me…

Aside from a good number of documents that the Hamvoip guy have out
there, I don’t see how the project gives back to the community, other
than by providing something geared for appliance folks.

Ham radio is and always has been a work together thing.

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:07 PM David McGough kb4fxc@inttek.net wrote:

You forgot to mention that “secret spy” software included in the HamVoIP
release is designed to dampen the Sun’s double-oscillator, throwing it
completely out of phase. With each new HamVoIP node deployed, the effect
becomes more pronounced, ultimately causing a Maunder Sunspot Minimum.
This, of course, is to the HamVoIP advantage, since no sunspots means
even
more hams will need AllStar for communications. Which, in turn, dampens
the Sun even more.

A movie is already in production. In this remake of the classic 1962
thriller “Dr. No,” SPECTRE is replaced SPARKY, AKA: John David McGough,
as
the Arch villain (running Arch Linux, of course). In a twist of the plot
from the original movie, SKYNET is accidentally created by huge
Raspberry
Pi cluster, leading to world domination.

…LMAO…

73, David KB4FXC


App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.


Tim WD6AWP


Tim WD6AWP


App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.


App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org
http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.


App_rpt-users mailing list

App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org

http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”

You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.


App_rpt-users mailing list

App_rpt-users@lists.allstarlink.org

http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”

You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.

I tried. See their response. In my opinion, it is disgraceful and inaccurate how they portrayed Jim Dixon. I will let you reach your own conclusion concerning their motivation. Response.pdf (53.4 KB) Your email.pdf (69.4 KB)