ASL V3 DDNS Problem

How do I fix this?

This is a friends ASL node and his resolv.conf file has an additional set of data which I can't seem to remove.

His DDNS will not resolve from anywhere. e.g. nslookup #####.nodes.allstarlink.org yields nothing. AS a result his node is not working right.

Roger
WA1NVC

Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)

DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN

127.0.0.53 is the systemd-resolved stub resolver.

run "resolvectl status" to see details about the actual nameservers.

nameserver 1.1.1.1
nameserver 1.0.0.1

nameserver 1.1.1.1
nameserver 1.0.0.1
nameserver 192.168.1.1
search mynetworksettings.com

What node #?

Also, they should check their "Portal" / "Node Settings" on www.allstarlink.org and check that the "Is node a remote base station" value set to "No". If the node was set as a remote base then the DNS name would be #####.remotebase.nodes.allstarlink.org.

The DNS resolver settings have nothing to do with the nodes.allstarlink.org. That's purely a function of registation.

True.

  • you need a viable DNS configuration that can resolve names
  • your node needs to successfully register, else we don't publish any DNS records for the node
  • the node configuration does impact what DNS records are published (####.nodes.allstarlink.org vs. ####.remotebase.allstarlink.org)

There is clearly a Linux problem. The second set of nameserver definitions should not be present. How do I fix it? I tried using nmcli but neither eth0 or ipv4.dns is recognised.

nameserver 1.1.1.1
nameserver 1.0.0.1

nameserver 1.1.1.1
nameserver 1.0.0.1
nameserver 192.168.1.1
search mynetworksettings.com

What does sudo resolvconf -l report on your system ?

Asking because one of my systems has the first 2 lines from "tun.wg0" (this particular node is configured to use 44Net) and the last lines are from "NetworkManager".

Nameservers of 1.1.1.1 and 1.0.0.1 is Cloudflare DNS. Unless the local network is blocking outbound DNS, that isn't a problem. It may not be want you want, but it shouldn't be broken.

And I guess that brings up the question... what exactly are you trying to have the configuration be?