Just keep in mind that the TXT record is for debugging and is not guaranteed to be consistently-formatted over time. In fact, we're already discussing dropping the RH attribute.
I kind of like the RT attribute..
Especially if it is hitting a pool of servers.
Knowing which one (of more than one if there’s more than one) it’s on can be useful.
Unless you are just presenting one hostname ahead of the load balancer.
Then it probably doesn’t matter.
You kind of like the RH (registration host) attribute or the RT (registration time) attribute?
Currently, our registration servers (register.allstarink.org) are setup with a simple / static DNS-based round robin load balancing. For now, this works but we haven't ruled out other models.
One of the gotchas with the current TXT record content is that each RH/RT change triggers a DNS update. One might suggest that there are not that many RH/RT changes but you need to keep in mind that your node(s) are constantly saying "Hey, I'm still here". That's a lot of unneeded churn.