From: "Scott Weis" <kb2ear@kb2ear.net>
Date: 2010/02/10 Wed PM 12:28:03 PST
To: app_rpt-users@qrvc.com
Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] 64 bitJust for fun I installed a 64-bit Centos on a machine and ran the phase1.sh
script etc. When it completed I had a fully 64 bit version up and running
with URI.73 de
Scott KB2EAR
From: <hwstar@rodgers.sdcoxmail.com>
To: "Ken" <ke2n@cs.com>; "'Steve Gladden'" <steve@michiganbroadband.com>
Cc: <app_rpt-users@qrvc.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] 64 bit>
>>
>> From: "Ken" <ke2n@cs.com>
>> Date: 2010/02/09 Tue AM 10:21:49 PST
>> To: "'Steve Gladden'" <steve@michiganbroadband.com>
>> CC: app_rpt-users@qrvc.com
>> Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] 64 bit
>>
>> Thanks Steve - see my question below
>>
>> > From: Steve Gladden [mailto:steve@michiganbroadband.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 11:38 AM
>> > To: Ken
>> > Cc: app_rpt-users@qrvc.com
>> > Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] 64 bit
>> >
>> > Hello Ken,
>> > I've done it in the past by copying all of the scripts from
>> > a live 32 bit system over to the 64 bit system.
>> > I first did all of the Centos updates on the 64 bit system..
>> >
>> > Then I ran the stage2 script on the 64bit system..
>>
>> =====
>> I would probably need more help with this than you could provide-
>> But, can you clarify - does this result in a "normal" 32 bit APP_RPT
>> running
>> under the 64 bit OS?
>>
>> Or does it use the 64 bit compiler, creating a 64-bit version of the
>> "forked" Asterisk code?
>> (This latter one sounds like it has some risk of not working).
>>
>> Ken Jamrogowicz
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> App_rpt-users mailing list
>> App_rpt-users@qrvc.com
>> http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>>
>
> You'll get 64 bit code of the forked version it it compiles without
> errors. It may work or it may not work I don't know. You would be on your
> own and we would not be able to support such a build as it is outside of
> the scope of the project.
>
> Steve
> WA6ZFT
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users@qrvc.com
> http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>
>_______________________________________________
App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@qrvc.com
http://qrvc.com/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
That may appear to be true, but without testing every last feature and configuration you won't know for sure. I'm hesitant to call something good when it was built and only briefly tested. However, if enough people test their specific configurations and have a positive experience then maybe it is mostly good.
Steve
WA6ZFT
ยทยทยท
----- Original Message -----
>> > -----Original Message-----