Why is the allstarlink staff so opposed to actually giving what they are actually seeing as the issue???
first the answer was that my ip address ended in .254 now the guess is node 1999
what about the actual data instead of guessing???
if someone would give me exact ally what they are seeing as the issue, such node number mac address something useful instead of general statement this could have resolved long ago.
in the ham VoIP by default the 1999 is commented out.
i provided the iax.conf registration lines showing both the private node number i assigned and the 1999 being commented out.
so it seems now i see hwy i am being singled out here, and not being helped it is because i am using the hamviop version.
some of the reasons i use the hamvoip version are when i was having issues with DIAL, the allstaling staff was not helpful (much like today) and the Hamvoip team was helpfull and without the bad attitude i and lack of information was getting from the allstarlink team.
now fast forward to today, last week i wanted to try a more powerful server to see if would resolve what i was doing. This was not an easy task, the asterisk service did not start and as a module was missing, had to research and find a solution, this took some time.
now if i need to build a hamvoip server if the radio is ready with the cable including burning the sim, i can have it working in 20 to 25 minuets. Huge difference.
now i will likely be told about the open source issues, frankly i do not care about those issues, the hamvoip team is easy to work with, and the software works, thus i do not care about the open source issues.
all i care about does it work and it does can i get answers what i kneed knowledge, yes i can. Unlike the allstarlink team.
tell me the exact node numbers mac address (something i can work with) you are having issues with and i will correct it
···
On Saturday, May 16, 2020, 04:36:59 PM PDT, Tim Sawyer via AllStarLink Discussion Groups noreply@community.allstarlink.org wrote:
wd6awp
ASL Admin
May 16
What about all the number 1999 nodes that exist on every HamVoIP node by default? Are those all not registering or stat posting?
Visit Topic or reply to this email to respond.
In Reply To
chris43
May 16
why do i need to keep prodding for more information, allstalink should clearly and consistency giving all information when telling someone that they have a problem. if you know it is a private node, tell the offender what privet node is causing the issue and how to fix it, why is this asking for t…
Previous Replies
chris43
May 16
why do i need to keep prodding for more information, allstalink should clearly and consistency giving all information when telling someone that they have a problem.
if you know it is a private node, tell the offender what privet node is causing the issue and how to fix it, why is this asking for too much.
i have a total of 3 private nodes here is from the iax.conf of each node
;register => 1128:@register.allstarlink.org
;register => xxxxx:yyyyyy@register.allstarlink.org
;register => 1129:@register.allstarlink.org
;register => xxxxx:yyyyyy@register.allstarlink.org
;register => 1127:@register.allstarlink.org
;register => xxxxx:yyyyyy@register.allstarlink.org
as you can see the line to not register is commented out.
if there is a private node left on by error more information will help to find it.
the WAN spans 2 States.
furthermore i find it hard to believe that even if my 3 nodes are where registering inappropriately that it could cause so much trouble that i need to be banned.
if errant data from 3 nodes can bring down the system i am surprised it works at all.
furthermore it seems to that allstarlink’s unwillingness to provide information and assistance tells mat they do not care to help, point fingers as this-is all i seem to get from allstarlink.
with by=ryans departure i thought allstarlink would improve i guess i was wrong.
instead of asking me to prove a negative (that i am not doing something) tell me what i need to know to resolve this issue.
as i keep asking please provide more information
··· (click for more details)
David_McGough
May 16
Just change the uhandler program to immediately drop private/invalid nodes and solve this problem.
Something like:
/* get all of the query fields */
f_node = getentry(“node”);
if ((!f_node) || (!alldigits(f_node)) || (*f_node == ‘1’) || (*f_node == ‘0’) || (*f_node == ‘3’) || (*f_node > ‘5’))
goto err;
wd6awp
ASL Admin
May 16
Our admin says you are registering and stat posting private nodes. If that’s not the case you can get with him to prove otherwise. I know you had a trouble in on this and the issue was not resolved. But that’s your only option at this point. I have no control of the firewall so there nothing more I can do. Sorry.
David_McGough
May 16
Seems like a simple solution would be to whitelist that one static IP address. I currently count 42 public nodes behind that single IP address. That’s going to generate a LOT of legitimate stats traffic!
chris43
May 16
Ok so tell me what i can do to resolve, all nodes have the default settings.
that being said there are more than 30 nodes behind this router at this time with more to come.
are you then saying that allstar can not support this?
i am not being given much information on what to look for?
if something is broken i need more information to find it.
is this one node, a few nodes, all notes or the combination of all nodes.
or are you saying that allstar can not support support the large number of nodes? if so what is the limit?
to ban someone without giving enough information to resolve the issue and without notice ( things where working good for a little while) is outrageous.
to be clear the general statement
“You really have to be flooding the hell out if stats like
he is to trigger this rule and ban action”
is overly general, does not provide any information on which node is causing this, or exactly what can cause this.
i am use stock settings with respect to any reporting, i changed nothing thus i do not know where to look.
or is this due to the number of nodes behind the firewall?
Please more info
··· (click for more details)
Visit Topic or reply to this email to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, click here.