# External Controller Plus Allstar

**URL:** <https://community.allstarlink.org/t/external-controller-plus-allstar/10971>\
**Category:** AllStarLink\
**Created:** [April 11, 2014, 4:48pm UTC](https://community.allstarlink.org/t/external-controller-plus-allstar/10971 "2014-04-11T16:48:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wayne](https://community.allstarlink.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/0ea827/32.png) [@Wayne](https://community.allstarlink.org/u/Wayne)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2014, 4:48pm UTC](https://community.allstarlink.org/t/external-controller-plus-allstar/10971/1 "2014-04-11T16:48:34Z")

</div>

“…If you mean you want to parallel app\_rpt/allstar with a existing  
hardwired controller, you will need to use “DUPLEX=0 &  
LINKTOLINK=YES” on the primary node for that/each location. It will  
give you the same fullduplex but with no hang time etc that you can parallel  
with existing controller. A port on your rc-210 if i remember them correct…”

I sincerely appreciate the answer but as I  
mentioned I am new to Allstar. As such I don’t know how to ask the  
question. I received this reply and appreciate the time it took to write. But I  
wonder if another user can offer insight into wiring. Do I wire the Allstar  
device to Port 1 and then the repeater to port 2? Do I keep the option of voted  
simulcast? Doing so only leaves one port remaining. Am I missing something in  
the translation here? Thank you. I appreciate your time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wayne](https://community.allstarlink.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/0ea827/32.png) [@Wayne](https://community.allstarlink.org/u/Wayne)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2014, 3:05am UTC](https://community.allstarlink.org/t/external-controller-plus-allstar/10971/2 "2014-04-12T03:05:14Z")

</div>

Hi Greg,

Thank you for taking the time to reply.

Our operational goal is a hybrid system  
that is voted and simulcast between two repeaters 100 miles apart but  
overlapping input coverage. They have no LOS. Site 1 and 2 are on a VLAN  
provided by the site vendor but Site 3 only has wireless internet. We will be  
using a RF link. We don’t want to use the public internet.

Each location will also have a remote base  
and a WX receiver with a FIPS code for that area only. Using some switching  
logic we will disconnect from Allstar if the WX receiver triggers. No need to send  
marine weather alerts to the desert.

The topology expected is Site 1 → Site  
2 (Allstar; voted), Site 1 → Site 3 (RF link; different frequency). Since  
it isn’t our VLAN we can’t use Ubiquity or similar to link to Site  
3 as an unvoted device. There is also significant overlap of outputs but I sure  
would love to be voted and have only one pair. That would be so nice. We  
already have RC-210’s so we don’t want to toss them aside and buy  
RTCM’s as just controllers as has been suggested. We will end up with  
RTCM’s for the voting ($$$) and the RC-210’s for control. Using the  
RC-210’s allows us cell phone access to the RC-210’s as well as  
through the remote bases.

As you probably know the RC-210’s  
have a 4th port that is no frills. The WX receivers can go on this “port”.

> **···**
>
> * * *
> 
> **From:** KJ6KO  
> [[mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com](mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com)]  
> **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 12:48  
> PM  
> **To:** Wayne  
> **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users]  
> External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> Wayne, I think  
> what we need is to figure out what exactly you are trying to do.
> 
> If you are running a full simulcast/voted system,  
> (multiple transmitters, multiple receivers with ALL receivers and transmitters  
> connected via Allstar) and want a backup RF link, you will need 3 total  
> ports. 1 for the repeater, 1 for the backup RF link and 1 for  
> the RTCM. Just treat the RTCM like a “Link Radio” as that is  
> basically what it is.
> 
> Since you are new to allstar, I assume that is not  
> the case.
> 
> If you are just trying to connect your repeater or repeater  
> system to Allstar, a RTCM is serious overkill! I would recommend a DMK  
> URI for 1/4 the price. You can even use it as the controller and  
> eliminate your current unit! It will still run as a standalone repeater  
> when offline.
> 
> Does that help?
> 
> Let us know what you have and what you would like to do and  
> we could probably be more help.
> 
> 73 de Greg KJ6KO
> 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > **From:** Wayne
> 
> > **To:** ‘app\_rpt  
> > mailing list’
> 
> > **Sent:** Friday, April 11,  
> > 2014 9:48 AM
> 
> > **Subject:** Re:  
> > [App\_rpt-users] External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > “…If you mean you want to parallel app\_rpt/allstar with a existing  
> > hardwired controller, you will need to use “DUPLEX=0 &  
> > LINKTOLINK=YES” on the primary node for that/each location. It will  
> > give you the same fullduplex but with no hang time etc that you can parallel  
> > with existing controller. A port on your rc-210 if i remember them correct…”
> 
> > I sincerely appreciate the answer but as I  
> > mentioned I am new to Allstar. As such I don’t know how to ask the  
> > question. I received this reply and appreciate the time it took to write. But I  
> > wonder if another user can offer insight into wiring. Do I wire the Allstar  
> > device to Port 1 and then the repeater to port 2? Do I keep the option of voted  
> > simulcast? Doing so only leaves one port remaining. Am I missing something in  
> > the translation here? Thank you. I appreciate your time.
> 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > database 9666 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)
> 
> > * * *
> 
> > * * *
> > 
> > App\_rpt-users mailing list
> > 
> > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)
> > 
> > [ohnosec.org](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this list please visit  
> > [ohnosec.org](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to  
> > the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the  
> > “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
> > 
> > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email  
> > confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the  
> > list detailing the problem.
> > 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > database 9666 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)
> 
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> database 9667 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tim\_Sawyer](https://community.allstarlink.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/bc79bd/32.png) [@Tim\_Sawyer](https://community.allstarlink.org/u/Tim_Sawyer)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2014, 4:12am UTC](https://community.allstarlink.org/t/external-controller-plus-allstar/10971/3 "2014-04-12T04:12:37Z")

</div>

Sorry to state the obvious, just want to make sure you have all the facts when developing your system. Obviously, voting selects the receiver with the best signal so if the RC-210 controller is always repeating the local RX audio then you can’t be voting.

> **···**
>
> –  
> Tim  
> :wq
> 
> On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:05 PM, Wayne [wayne@anywherehost.net](mailto:wayne@anywherehost.net) wrote:
> 
> > We will end up with RTCM’s for the voting ($$$) and the RC-210’s for control. Using the RC-210’s allows us cell phone access to the RC-210’s as well as through the remote bases.
> 
> >

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wayne](https://community.allstarlink.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/0ea827/32.png) [@Wayne](https://community.allstarlink.org/u/Wayne)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2014, 11:38am UTC](https://community.allstarlink.org/t/external-controller-plus-allstar/10971/4 "2014-04-12T11:38:40Z")

</div>

I am completely confused by your first  
reply that said:

“If you are running  
a full simulcast/voted system, (multiple transmitters, multiple receivers with  
ALL receivers and transmitters connected via Allstar) and want a backup  
RF link, you will need 3 total ports. 1 for the repeater, 1 for the  
backup RF link and 1 for the RTCM. Just treat the RTCM like a “Link  
Radio” as that is basically what it is.”

It’s early now and I may be missing  
something. Are you suggesting that this won’t work? I of course mean no  
disrespect. I’ve just pulled a double shift and I’m pretty beat and  
may not be understanding.

> **···**
>
> * * *
> 
> **From:** KJ6KO [[mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com](mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com)]  
> **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 9:57  
> PM  
> **To:** Wayne  
> **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users]  
> External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> Well, I don’t know how much help I can be here. I  
> don’t use voting, don’t like it, never will, but that’s me. Trying to  
> combine a voted system of RTCM’s into a regular RF link may be  
> interesting. Not sure how the RTCM will react to a “link” input  
> as it is used to discriminator input as far as know.
> 
> There are people more familiar with RTCM’s voting and  
> simulcasting than I am that may be able to help you.
> 
> I use URI’s and have just connected them directly to  
> controller ports, like you would a link radio, and they work and sound  
> great! I have even used them as the controller and sound even better!
> 
> Sorry I can’t be much more help than that!
> 
> good luck and 73 de Greg
> 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > **From:** Wayne
> 
> > **To:** ‘app\_rpt  
> > mailing list’
> 
> > **Sent:** Friday, April 11,  
> > 2014 8:05 PM
> 
> > **Subject:** Re:  
> > [App\_rpt-users] External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > Hi Greg,
> 
> > Thank you for taking the time to reply.
> 
> > Our operational goal is a hybrid system  
> > that is voted and simulcast between two repeaters 100 miles apart but  
> > overlapping input coverage. They have no LOS. Site 1 and 2 are on a VLAN  
> > provided by the site vendor but Site 3 only has wireless internet. We will be  
> > using a RF link. We don’t want to use the public internet.
> 
> > Each location will also have a remote base  
> > and a WX receiver with a FIPS code for that area only. Using some switching  
> > logic we will disconnect from Allstar if the WX receiver triggers. No need to  
> > send marine weather alerts to the desert.
> 
> > The topology expected is Site 1 → Site  
> > 2 (Allstar; voted), Site 1 → Site 3 (RF link; different frequency). Since  
> > it isn’t our VLAN we can’t use Ubiquity or similar to link to Site  
> > 3 as an unvoted device. There is also significant overlap of outputs but I sure  
> > would love to be voted and have only one pair. That would be so nice. We  
> > already have RC-210’s so we don’t want to toss them aside and buy  
> > RTCM’s as just controllers as has been suggested. We will end up with  
> > RTCM’s for the voting ($$$) and the RC-210’s for control. Using the  
> > RC-210’s allows us cell phone access to the RC-210’s as well as  
> > through the remote bases.
> 
> > As you probably know the RC-210’s  
> > have a 4th port that is no frills. The WX receivers can go on this  
> > “port”.
> 
> > * * *
> 
> > **From:** KJ6KO [[mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com](mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com)]  
> > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 12:48  
> > PM  
> > **To:** Wayne  
> > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users]  
> > External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > Wayne, I think  
> > what we need is to figure out what exactly you are trying to do.
> 
> > If you are running a full simulcast/voted system,  
> > (multiple transmitters, multiple receivers with ALL receivers and transmitters  
> > connected via Allstar) and want a backup RF link, you will need 3 total  
> > ports. 1 for the repeater, 1 for the backup RF link and 1 for  
> > the RTCM. Just treat the RTCM like a “Link Radio” as that is  
> > basically what it is.
> 
> > Since you are new to allstar, I assume that is not  
> > the case.
> 
> > If you are just trying to connect your repeater or repeater  
> > system to Allstar, a RTCM is serious overkill! I would recommend a DMK  
> > URI for 1/4 the price. You can even use it as the controller and  
> > eliminate your current unit! It will still run as a standalone repeater  
> > when offline.
> 
> > Does that help?
> 
> > Let us know what you have and what you would like to do and  
> > we could probably be more help.
> 
> > 73 de Greg KJ6KO
> 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > > **From:** Wayne
> 
> > > **To:** ‘app\_rpt  
> > > mailing list’
> 
> > > **Sent:** Friday, April 11,  
> > > 2014 9:48 AM
> 
> > > **Subject:** Re:  
> > > [App\_rpt-users] External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > > “…If you mean you want to parallel app\_rpt/allstar with a existing  
> > > hardwired controller, you will need to use “DUPLEX=0 &  
> > > LINKTOLINK=YES” on the primary node for that/each location. It will  
> > > give you the same fullduplex but with no hang time etc that you can parallel  
> > > with existing controller. A port on your rc-210 if i remember them correct…”
> 
> > > I sincerely appreciate the answer but as I  
> > > mentioned I am new to Allstar. As such I don’t know how to ask the  
> > > question. I received this reply and appreciate the time it took to write. But I  
> > > wonder if another user can offer insight into wiring. Do I wire the Allstar  
> > > device to Port 1 and then the repeater to port 2? Do I keep the option of voted  
> > > simulcast? Doing so only leaves one port remaining. Am I missing something in  
> > > the translation here? Thank you. I appreciate your time.
> 
> > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > > database 9666 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > 
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > 
> > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)
> 
> > > * * *
> 
> > > * * *
> > > 
> > > App\_rpt-users mailing list
> > > 
> > > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)
> > > 
> > > [ohnosec.org](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > > 
> > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit  
> > > [ohnosec.org](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to  
> > > the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the  
> > > “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
> > > 
> > > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email  
> > > confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the  
> > > list detailing the problem.
> > > 
> > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > > database 9666 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > 
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > 
> > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)
> 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > database 9667 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)
> 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)
> 
> > * * *
> 
> > * * *
> > 
> > App\_rpt-users mailing list
> > 
> > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)
> > 
> > [ohnosec.org](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this list please visit [ohnosec.org](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)  
> > and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press  
> > the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
> > 
> > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation.  
> > If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing  
> > the problem.
> > 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)
> 
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wayne](https://community.allstarlink.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/0ea827/32.png) [@Wayne](https://community.allstarlink.org/u/Wayne)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2014, 11:53am UTC](https://community.allstarlink.org/t/external-controller-plus-allstar/10971/5 "2014-04-12T11:53:15Z")

</div>

One more thought, if I may. How do voted  
systems bring in IRLP or EchoLink? Aren’t we talking about something  
similar? I’m really bummed now.

> **···**
>
> * * *
> 
> **From:** KJ6KO [[mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com](mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com)]  
> **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 9:57  
> PM  
> **To:** Wayne  
> **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users]  
> External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> Well, I don’t know how much help I can be here. I  
> don’t use voting, don’t like it, never will, but that’s me. Trying to  
> combine a voted system of RTCM’s into a regular RF link may be  
> interesting. Not sure how the RTCM will react to a “link” input  
> as it is used to discriminator input as far as know.
> 
> There are people more familiar with RTCM’s voting and  
> simulcasting than I am that may be able to help you.
> 
> I use URI’s and have just connected them directly to  
> controller ports, like you would a link radio, and they work and sound  
> great! I have even used them as the controller and sound even better!
> 
> Sorry I can’t be much more help than that!
> 
> good luck and 73 de Greg
> 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > **From:** Wayne
> 
> > **To:** ‘app\_rpt  
> > mailing list’
> 
> > **Sent:** Friday, April 11,  
> > 2014 8:05 PM
> 
> > **Subject:** Re:  
> > [App\_rpt-users] External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > Hi Greg,
> 
> > Thank you for taking the time to reply.
> 
> > Our operational goal is a hybrid system  
> > that is voted and simulcast between two repeaters 100 miles apart but  
> > overlapping input coverage. They have no LOS. Site 1 and 2 are on a VLAN  
> > provided by the site vendor but Site 3 only has wireless internet. We will be  
> > using a RF link. We don’t want to use the public internet.
> 
> > Each location will also have a remote base  
> > and a WX receiver with a FIPS code for that area only. Using some switching  
> > logic we will disconnect from Allstar if the WX receiver triggers. No need to  
> > send marine weather alerts to the desert.
> 
> > The topology expected is Site 1 → Site  
> > 2 (Allstar; voted), Site 1 → Site 3 (RF link; different frequency). Since  
> > it isn’t our VLAN we can’t use Ubiquity or similar to link to Site  
> > 3 as an unvoted device. There is also significant overlap of outputs but I sure  
> > would love to be voted and have only one pair. That would be so nice. We  
> > already have RC-210’s so we don’t want to toss them aside and buy  
> > RTCM’s as just controllers as has been suggested. We will end up with  
> > RTCM’s for the voting ($$$) and the RC-210’s for control. Using the  
> > RC-210’s allows us cell phone access to the RC-210’s as well as  
> > through the remote bases.
> 
> > As you probably know the RC-210’s  
> > have a 4th port that is no frills. The WX receivers can go on this  
> > “port”.
> 
> > * * *
> 
> > **From:** KJ6KO [[mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com](mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com)]  
> > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 12:48  
> > PM  
> > **To:** Wayne  
> > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users]  
> > External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > Wayne, I think  
> > what we need is to figure out what exactly you are trying to do.
> 
> > If you are running a full simulcast/voted system,  
> > (multiple transmitters, multiple receivers with ALL receivers and transmitters  
> > connected via Allstar) and want a backup RF link, you will need 3 total  
> > ports. 1 for the repeater, 1 for the backup RF link and 1 for  
> > the RTCM. Just treat the RTCM like a “Link Radio” as that is  
> > basically what it is.
> 
> > Since you are new to allstar, I assume that is not  
> > the case.
> 
> > If you are just trying to connect your repeater or repeater  
> > system to Allstar, a RTCM is serious overkill! I would recommend a DMK  
> > URI for 1/4 the price. You can even use it as the controller and  
> > eliminate your current unit! It will still run as a standalone repeater  
> > when offline.
> 
> > Does that help?
> 
> > Let us know what you have and what you would like to do and  
> > we could probably be more help.
> 
> > 73 de Greg KJ6KO
> 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > > **From:** Wayne
> 
> > > **To:** ‘app\_rpt  
> > > mailing list’
> 
> > > **Sent:** Friday, April 11,  
> > > 2014 9:48 AM
> 
> > > **Subject:** Re:  
> > > [App\_rpt-users] External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > > “…If you mean you want to parallel app\_rpt/allstar with a existing  
> > > hardwired controller, you will need to use “DUPLEX=0 &  
> > > LINKTOLINK=YES” on the primary node for that/each location. It will  
> > > give you the same fullduplex but with no hang time etc that you can parallel  
> > > with existing controller. A port on your rc-210 if i remember them correct…”
> 
> > > I sincerely appreciate the answer but as I  
> > > mentioned I am new to Allstar. As such I don’t know how to ask the  
> > > question. I received this reply and appreciate the time it took to write. But I  
> > > wonder if another user can offer insight into wiring. Do I wire the Allstar device  
> > > to Port 1 and then the repeater to port 2? Do I keep the option of voted  
> > > simulcast? Doing so only leaves one port remaining. Am I missing something in  
> > > the translation here? Thank you. I appreciate your time.
> 
> > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > > database 9666 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > 
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > 
> > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)
> 
> > > * * *
> 
> > > * * *
> > > 
> > > App\_rpt-users mailing list
> > > 
> > > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)
> > > 
> > > [ohnosec.org](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > > 
> > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit  
> > > [ohnosec.org](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to  
> > > the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the  
> > > “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
> > > 
> > > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email  
> > > confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the  
> > > list detailing the problem.
> > > 
> > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > > database 9666 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > 
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > 
> > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)
> 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > database 9667 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)
> 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)
> 
> > * * *
> 
> > * * *
> > 
> > App\_rpt-users mailing list
> > 
> > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)
> > 
> > [ohnosec.org](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this list please visit  
> > [ohnosec.org](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to  
> > the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the  
> > “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
> > 
> > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email  
> > confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the  
> > list detailing the problem.
> > 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)
> 
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tim\_Sawyer](https://community.allstarlink.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/bc79bd/32.png) [@Tim\_Sawyer](https://community.allstarlink.org/u/Tim_Sawyer)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2014, 2:37pm UTC](https://community.allstarlink.org/t/external-controller-plus-allstar/10971/6 "2014-04-12T14:37:28Z")

</div>

So the way a voter a voter works is it samples the noise (like squelch does) on each receiver and then takes the signal with the least noise and sends it to the transmitter. If you have a controller in front of the RTCM the controller will always be sending the receiver to the transmitter even if the signal has noise.

RTCMs are just smart IO devices. Think of them as not being much different than a sound FOB on the end of an ethernet cable. Generally, with RTCMs, the computer will be at some central location on the ground and the RTCMs will be far away on a high hill or tower.

In your case, because your IP network is only between your two hills, the computer will be at one site or the other. So wherever the computer is located, is where you would connect in your IRLP box with a URI or other sound FOB. Echolink could be on that same (or a different) box. Echolink is a app that runs on the Allstar computer no sound FOB or URI required.

It really comes down to this: you either use Allstar or you don’t. The other issue you’ve not touched on yet it touch tone commands. Trying to work out a scheme where the RC-210 commands and the Allstar commands don’t conflict is difficult and confusing for your users.

My recommendation is to save the RC-210s for another project. Put RTCM’s on your three hills connected directly to the repeaters. Put the Allstar computer on the ground on your IP network. Get 5 Allstar nodes: Use one node for the voting system of Site 1 and 2. Use another node for site 3. Use a node for the IRLP URI. Use a node for Echolink. That way you have the most flexibility while using the lease amount of hardware and having a clean TT command structure.

> **···**
>
> –
> 
> Tim
> 
> :wq
> 
> On Apr 12, 2014, at 4:53 AM, Wayne [wayne@anywherehost.net](mailto:wayne@anywherehost.net) wrote:
> 
> > One more thought, if I may. How do voted systems bring in IRLP or EchoLink? Aren’t we talking about something similar? I’m really bummed now.
> 
> > * * *
> 
> > **From:** KJ6KO [[mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com](mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com)]  
> > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 9:57 PM  
> > **To:** Wayne  
> > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > Well, I don’t know how much help I can be here. I don’t use voting, don’t like it, never will, but that’s me. Trying to combine a voted system of RTCM’s into a regular RF link may be interesting. Not sure how the RTCM will react to a “link” input as it is used to discriminator input as far as know.
> 
> > There are people more familiar with RTCM’s voting and simulcasting than I am that may be able to help you.
> 
> > I use URI’s and have just connected them directly to controller ports, like you would a link radio, and they work and sound great! I have even used them as the controller and sound even better!
> 
> > Sorry I can’t be much more help than that!
> 
> > good luck and 73 de Greg
> 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > > **From:** Wayne
> 
> > > **To:** ‘app\_rpt mailing list’
> 
> > > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 8:05 PM
> 
> > > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > > Hi Greg,
> 
> > > Thank you for taking the time to reply.
> 
> > > Our operational goal is a hybrid system that is voted and simulcast between two repeaters 100 miles apart but overlapping input coverage. They have no LOS. Site 1 and 2 are on a VLAN provided by the site vendor but Site 3 only has wireless internet. We will be using a RF link. We don’t want to use the public internet.
> 
> > > Each location will also have a remote base and a WX receiver with a FIPS code for that area only. Using some switching logic we will disconnect from Allstar if the WX receiver triggers. No need to send marine weather alerts to the desert.
> 
> > > The topology expected is Site 1 → Site 2 (Allstar; voted), Site 1 → Site 3 (RF link; different frequency). Since it isn’t our VLAN we can’t use Ubiquity or similar to link to Site 3 as an unvoted device. There is also significant overlap of outputs but I sure would love to be voted and have only one pair. That would be so nice. We already have RC-210’s so we don’t want to toss them aside and buy RTCM’s as just controllers as has been suggested. We will end up with RTCM’s for the voting ($$$) and the RC-210’s for control. Using the RC-210’s allows us cell phone access to the RC-210’s as well as through the remote bases.
> 
> > > As you probably know the RC-210’s have a 4th port that is no frills. The WX receivers can go on this “port”.
> 
> > > * * *
> 
> > > **From:** KJ6KO [[mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com](mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com)]  
> > > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 12:48 PM  
> > > **To:** Wayne  
> > > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > > Wayne, I think what we need is to figure out what exactly you are trying to do.
> 
> > > If you are running a full simulcast/voted system, (multiple transmitters, multiple receivers with ALL receivers and transmitters connected via Allstar) and want a backup RF link, you will need 3 total ports. 1 for the repeater, 1 for the backup RF link and 1 for the RTCM. Just treat the RTCM like a “Link Radio” as that is basically what it is.
> 
> > > Since you are new to allstar, I assume that is not the case.
> 
> > > If you are just trying to connect your repeater or repeater system to Allstar, a RTCM is serious overkill! I would recommend a DMK URI for 1/4 the price. You can even use it as the controller and eliminate your current unit! It will still run as a standalone repeater when offline.
> 
> > > Does that help?
> 
> > > Let us know what you have and what you would like to do and we could probably be more help.
> 
> > > 73 de Greg KJ6KO
> 
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > > > **From:** Wayne
> 
> > > > **To:** ‘app\_rpt mailing list’
> 
> > > > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 9:48 AM
> 
> > > > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > > > “…If you mean you want to parallel app\_rpt/allstar with a existing hardwired controller, you will need to use “DUPLEX=0 & LINKTOLINK=YES” on the primary node for that/each location. It will give you the same fullduplex but with no hang time etc that you can parallel with existing controller. A port on your rc-210 if i remember them correct…”
> 
> > > > I sincerely appreciate the answer but as I mentioned I am new to Allstar. As such I don’t know how to ask the question. I received this reply and appreciate the time it took to write. But I wonder if another user can offer insight into wiring. Do I wire the Allstar device to Port 1 and then the repeater to port 2? Do I keep the option of voted simulcast? Doing so only leaves one port remaining. Am I missing something in the translation here? Thank you. I appreciate your time.
> 
> > > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 9666 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > > 
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > 
> > > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > > > * * *
> 
> > > > * * *
> > > > 
> > > > App\_rpt-users mailing list  
> > > > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)  
> > > > [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > > > 
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”  
> > > > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.
> > > > 
> > > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 9666 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > > 
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > 
> > > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 9667 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > 
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > 
> > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > 
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > 
> > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > > * * *
> 
> > > * * *
> > > 
> > > App\_rpt-users mailing list  
> > > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)  
> > > [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > > 
> > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”  
> > > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.
> > > 
> > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > 
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > 
> > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > * * *
> > 
> > App\_rpt-users mailing list  
> > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)  
> > [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this list please visit [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”  
> > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tim\_Sawyer](https://community.allstarlink.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/bc79bd/32.png) [@Tim\_Sawyer](https://community.allstarlink.org/u/Tim_Sawyer)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2014, 2:51pm UTC](https://community.allstarlink.org/t/external-controller-plus-allstar/10971/7 "2014-04-12T14:51:03Z")

</div>

I forgot to address your remote base requirement. RTCMs do not support remote bases. You will need a computer and URI where the remote base is. But check to see if you radio is supported. Allstar doesn’t support many.

> **···**
>
> –
> 
> Tim
> 
> :wq
> 
> On Apr 12, 2014, at 7:37 AM, Tim Sawyer [tim.sawyer@mac.com](mailto:tim.sawyer@mac.com) wrote:
> 
> > So the way a voter a voter works is it samples the noise (like squelch does) on each receiver and then takes the signal with the least noise and sends it to the transmitter. If you have a controller in front of the RTCM the controller will always be sending the receiver to the transmitter even if the signal has noise.
> 
> > RTCMs are just smart IO devices. Think of them as not being much different than a sound FOB on the end of an ethernet cable. Generally, with RTCMs, the computer will be at some central location on the ground and the RTCMs will be far away on a high hill or tower.
> 
> > 
> 
> > In your case, because your IP network is only between your two hills, the computer will be at one site or the other. So wherever the computer is located, is where you would connect in your IRLP box with a URI or other sound FOB. Echolink could be on that same (or a different) box. Echolink is a app that runs on the Allstar computer no sound FOB or URI required.
> 
> > 
> 
> > It really comes down to this: you either use Allstar or you don’t. The other issue you’ve not touched on yet it touch tone commands. Trying to work out a scheme where the RC-210 commands and the Allstar commands don’t conflict is difficult and confusing for your users.
> 
> > 
> 
> > My recommendation is to save the RC-210s for another project. Put RTCM’s on your three hills connected directly to the repeaters. Put the Allstar computer on the ground on your IP network. Get 5 Allstar nodes: Use one node for the voting system of Site 1 and 2. Use another node for site 3. Use a node for the IRLP URI. Use a node for Echolink. That way you have the most flexibility while using the lease amount of hardware and having a clean TT command structure.
> 
> > –
> 
> > Tim
> 
> > :wq
> 
> > On Apr 12, 2014, at 4:53 AM, Wayne [wayne@anywherehost.net](mailto:wayne@anywherehost.net) wrote:
> 
> > 
> 
> > > One more thought, if I may. How do voted systems bring in IRLP or EchoLink? Aren’t we talking about something similar? I’m really bummed now.
> 
> > > * * *
> 
> > > **From:** KJ6KO [[mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com](mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com)]  
> > > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 9:57 PM  
> > > **To:** Wayne  
> > > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > > Well, I don’t know how much help I can be here. I don’t use voting, don’t like it, never will, but that’s me. Trying to combine a voted system of RTCM’s into a regular RF link may be interesting. Not sure how the RTCM will react to a “link” input as it is used to discriminator input as far as know.
> 
> > > There are people more familiar with RTCM’s voting and simulcasting than I am that may be able to help you.
> 
> > > I use URI’s and have just connected them directly to controller ports, like you would a link radio, and they work and sound great! I have even used them as the controller and sound even better!
> 
> > > Sorry I can’t be much more help than that!
> 
> > > good luck and 73 de Greg
> 
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > > > **From:** Wayne
> 
> > > > **To:** ‘app\_rpt mailing list’
> 
> > > > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 8:05 PM
> 
> > > > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > > > Hi Greg,
> 
> > > > Thank you for taking the time to reply.
> 
> > > > Our operational goal is a hybrid system that is voted and simulcast between two repeaters 100 miles apart but overlapping input coverage. They have no LOS. Site 1 and 2 are on a VLAN provided by the site vendor but Site 3 only has wireless internet. We will be using a RF link. We don’t want to use the public internet.
> 
> > > > Each location will also have a remote base and a WX receiver with a FIPS code for that area only. Using some switching logic we will disconnect from Allstar if the WX receiver triggers. No need to send marine weather alerts to the desert.
> 
> > > > The topology expected is Site 1 → Site 2 (Allstar; voted), Site 1 → Site 3 (RF link; different frequency). Since it isn’t our VLAN we can’t use Ubiquity or similar to link to Site 3 as an unvoted device. There is also significant overlap of outputs but I sure would love to be voted and have only one pair. That would be so nice. We already have RC-210’s so we don’t want to toss them aside and buy RTCM’s as just controllers as has been suggested. We will end up with RTCM’s for the voting ($$$) and the RC-210’s for control. Using the RC-210’s allows us cell phone access to the RC-210’s as well as through the remote bases.
> 
> > > > As you probably know the RC-210’s have a 4th port that is no frills. The WX receivers can go on this “port”.
> 
> > > > * * *
> 
> > > > **From:** KJ6KO [[mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com](mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com)]  
> > > > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 12:48 PM  
> > > > **To:** Wayne  
> > > > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > > > Wayne, I think what we need is to figure out what exactly you are trying to do.
> 
> > > > If you are running a full simulcast/voted system, (multiple transmitters, multiple receivers with ALL receivers and transmitters connected via Allstar) and want a backup RF link, you will need 3 total ports. 1 for the repeater, 1 for the backup RF link and 1 for the RTCM. Just treat the RTCM like a “Link Radio” as that is basically what it is.
> 
> > > > Since you are new to allstar, I assume that is not the case.
> 
> > > > If you are just trying to connect your repeater or repeater system to Allstar, a RTCM is serious overkill! I would recommend a DMK URI for 1/4 the price. You can even use it as the controller and eliminate your current unit! It will still run as a standalone repeater when offline.
> 
> > > > Does that help?
> 
> > > > Let us know what you have and what you would like to do and we could probably be more help.
> 
> > > > 73 de Greg KJ6KO
> 
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > > > > **From:** Wayne
> 
> > > > > **To:** ‘app\_rpt mailing list’
> 
> > > > > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 9:48 AM
> 
> > > > > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > > > > “…If you mean you want to parallel app\_rpt/allstar with a existing hardwired controller, you will need to use “DUPLEX=0 & LINKTOLINK=YES” on the primary node for that/each location. It will give you the same fullduplex but with no hang time etc that you can parallel with existing controller. A port on your rc-210 if i remember them correct…”
> 
> > > > > I sincerely appreciate the answer but as I mentioned I am new to Allstar. As such I don’t know how to ask the question. I received this reply and appreciate the time it took to write. But I wonder if another user can offer insight into wiring. Do I wire the Allstar device to Port 1 and then the repeater to port 2? Do I keep the option of voted simulcast? Doing so only leaves one port remaining. Am I missing something in the translation here? Thank you. I appreciate your time.
> 
> > > > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 9666 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > > > 
> > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > > 
> > > > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > > > > * * *
> 
> > > > > * * *
> > > > > 
> > > > > App\_rpt-users mailing list  
> > > > > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)  
> > > > > [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > > > > 
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”  
> > > > > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.
> > > > > 
> > > > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 9666 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > > > 
> > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > > 
> > > > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 9667 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > > 
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > 
> > > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > > 
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > 
> > > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > > > * * *
> 
> > > > * * *
> > > > 
> > > > App\_rpt-users mailing list  
> > > > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)  
> > > > [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > > > 
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”  
> > > > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.
> > > > 
> > > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > > 
> > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > > 
> > > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > 
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > 
> > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > > * * *
> > > 
> > > App\_rpt-users mailing list  
> > > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)  
> > > [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > > 
> > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”  
> > > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.
> 
> > 
> 
> > * * *
> > 
> > App\_rpt-users mailing list  
> > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)  
> > [ohnosec.org](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this list please visit [ohnosec.org](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options button”  
> > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wayne](https://community.allstarlink.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/0ea827/32.png) [@Wayne](https://community.allstarlink.org/u/Wayne)\
**Post date:** [April 12, 2014, 9:58pm UTC](https://community.allstarlink.org/t/external-controller-plus-allstar/10971/8 "2014-04-12T21:58:57Z")

</div>

So if I understand you I should dump the  
RC-210’s and just use RTCM’s over the public internet? That’s the only way I’ll  
get the third site in as an unvoted link.

> **···**
>
> * * *
> 
> **From:** Tim Sawyer  
> [[mailto:tim.sawyer@mac.com](mailto:tim.sawyer@mac.com)]  
> **Sent:** Saturday, April 12, 2014  
> 7:37 AM  
> **To:** Wayne  
> **Cc:** app\_rpt mailing list  
> **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users]  
> External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> So the way a voter a voter works is it samples the noise (like squelch  
> does) on each receiver and then takes the signal with the least noise and sends  
> it to the transmitter. If you have a controller in front of the RTCM the  
> controller will always be sending the receiver to the transmitter even if the  
> signal has noise.
> 
> RTCMs are just smart IO devices. Think of them as not being much  
> different than a sound FOB on the end of an ethernet cable. Generally, with  
> RTCMs, the computer will be at some central location on the ground and the  
> RTCMs will be far away on a high hill or tower.
> 
> In your case, because your IP network is only between your two hills,  
> the computer will be at one site or the other. So wherever the computer is  
> located, is where you would connect in your IRLP box with a URI or other sound  
> FOB. Echolink could be on that same (or a different) box. Echolink is a app  
> that runs on the Allstar computer no sound FOB or URI required.
> 
> It really comes down to this: you either use Allstar or you don’t. The  
> other issue you’ve not touched on yet it touch tone commands. Trying to work out  
> a scheme where the RC-210 commands and the Allstar commands don’t conflict is  
> difficult and confusing for your users.
> 
> My recommendation is to save the RC-210s for another project. Put  
> RTCM’s on your three hills connected directly to the repeaters. Put the Allstar  
> computer on the ground on your IP network. Get 5 Allstar nodes: Use one node  
> for the voting system of Site 1 and 2. Use another node for site 3. Use a node  
> for the IRLP URI. Use a node for Echolink. That way you have the most  
> flexibility while using the lease amount of hardware and having a clean TT  
> command structure.
> 
> –
> 
> Tim
> 
> :wq
> 
> On Apr 12, 2014, at 4:53 AM, Wayne [wayne@anywherehost.net](mailto:wayne@anywherehost.net) wrote:
> 
> One more thought, if I may. How do voted  
> systems bring in IRLP or EchoLink? Aren’t we talking about something similar?  
> I’m really bummed now.
> 
> * * *
> 
> **From:** KJ6KO [[mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com](mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com)]  
> **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 9:57 PM  
> **To:** Wayne  
> **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External  
> Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> Well, I don’t know how much help I can be here. I  
> don’t use voting, don’t like it, never will, but that’s me. Trying to  
> combine a voted system of RTCM’s into a regular RF link may be  
> interesting. Not sure how the RTCM will react to a “link” input  
> as it is used to discriminator input as far as know.
> 
> There are people more familiar with RTCM’s voting and  
> simulcasting than I am that may be able to help you.
> 
> I use URI’s and have just connected them directly to  
> controller ports, like you would a link radio, and they work and sound  
> great! I have even used them as the controller and sound even better!
> 
> Sorry I can’t be much more help than that!
> 
> good luck and 73 de Greg
> 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > **From:** Wayne
> 
> > **To:** ‘app\_rpt  
> > mailing list’
> 
> > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 8:05 PM
> 
> > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External  
> > Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > Hi Greg,
> 
> > Thank you for taking the time to reply.
> 
> > Our operational goal is a hybrid system  
> > that is voted and simulcast between two repeaters 100 miles apart but  
> > overlapping input coverage. They have no LOS. Site 1 and 2 are on a VLAN  
> > provided by the site vendor but Site 3 only has wireless internet. We will be  
> > using a RF link. We don’t want to use the public internet.
> 
> > Each location will also have a remote base  
> > and a WX receiver with a FIPS code for that area only. Using some switching  
> > logic we will disconnect from Allstar if the WX receiver triggers. No need to  
> > send marine weather alerts to the desert.
> 
> > The topology expected is Site 1 → Site  
> > 2 (Allstar; voted), Site 1 → Site 3 (RF link; different frequency). Since  
> > it isn’t our VLAN we can’t use Ubiquity or similar to link to Site 3 as an  
> > unvoted device. There is also significant overlap of outputs but I sure would  
> > love to be voted and have only one pair. That would be so nice. We already have  
> > RC-210’s so we don’t want to toss them aside and buy RTCM’s as just controllers  
> > as has been suggested. We will end up with RTCM’s for the voting ($$$) and the  
> > RC-210’s for control. Using the RC-210’s allows us cell phone access to the  
> > RC-210’s as well as through the remote bases.
> 
> > As you probably know the RC-210’s have a 4th port that is no frills. The WX  
> > receivers can go on this “port”.
> 
> > * * *
> 
> > **From:** KJ6KO [[mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com](mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com)]  
> > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 12:48 PM  
> > **To:** Wayne  
> > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External  
> > Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > Wayne,  
> > I think what we need is to figure out what exactly you are trying to do.
> 
> > If you are running a full simulcast/voted system,  
> > (multiple transmitters, multiple receivers with ALL receivers and transmitters  
> > connected via Allstar) and want a backup RF link, you will need 3 total  
> > ports. 1 for the repeater, 1 for the backup RF link and 1 for  
> > the RTCM. Just treat the RTCM like a “Link Radio” as that is  
> > basically what it is.
> 
> > Since you are new to allstar, I assume that is not  
> > the case.
> 
> > If you are just trying to connect your repeater or repeater  
> > system to Allstar, a RTCM is serious overkill! I would recommend a DMK  
> > URI for 1/4 the price. You can even use it as the controller and  
> > eliminate your current unit! It will still run as a standalone repeater  
> > when offline.
> 
> > Does that help?
> 
> > Let us know what you have and what you would like to do and  
> > we could probably be more help.
> 
> > 73 de Greg KJ6KO
> 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > > **From:** Wayne
> 
> > > **To:** ‘app\_rpt  
> > > mailing list’
> 
> > > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 9:48 AM
> 
> > > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External  
> > > Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > > “…If you mean you  
> > > want to parallel app\_rpt/allstar with a existing hardwired controller, you will  
> > > need to use “DUPLEX=0 & LINKTOLINK=YES” on the primary node for  
> > > that/each location. It will give you the same fullduplex but with no hang  
> > > time etc that you can parallel with existing controller. A port on your rc-210  
> > > if i remember them correct…”
> 
> > > I sincerely appreciate the answer but as I  
> > > mentioned I am new to Allstar. As such I don’t know how to ask the question. I  
> > > received this reply and appreciate the time it took to write. But I wonder if  
> > > another user can offer insight into wiring. Do I wire the Allstar device to  
> > > Port 1 and then the repeater to port 2? Do I keep the option of voted  
> > > simulcast? Doing so only leaves one port remaining. Am I missing something in  
> > > the translation here? Thank you. I appreciate your time.
> 
> > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > > database 9666 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > 
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > 
> > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > > * * *
> 
> > > * * *
> > > 
> > > App\_rpt-users mailing list
> > > 
> > > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)
> > > 
> > > [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > > 
> > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to the bottom of the  
> > > page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options  
> > > button”
> > > 
> > > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email  
> > > confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the  
> > > list detailing the problem.
> > > 
> > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > > database 9666 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > 
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > 
> > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > database 9667 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > * * *
> 
> > * * *
> > 
> > App\_rpt-users mailing list
> > 
> > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)
> > 
> > [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this list please visit [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to the bottom of the  
> > page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options  
> > button”
> > 
> > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email  
> > confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the  
> > list detailing the problem.
> > 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> * * *
> 
> App\_rpt-users mailing list
> 
> [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)
> 
> [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> 
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to the bottom of the  
> page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options  
> button”
> 
> You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email  
> confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the  
> list detailing the problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wayne](https://community.allstarlink.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/w/0ea827/32.png) [@Wayne](https://community.allstarlink.org/u/Wayne)\
**Post date:** [April 13, 2014, 11:08am UTC](https://community.allstarlink.org/t/external-controller-plus-allstar/10971/9 "2014-04-13T11:08:52Z")

</div>

Let me see if I have this sorted out. If  
we ditch the RC-210’s we can vote. We can add simple URI’s to bring  
in a WX receiver, IRLP, possibly a RF link? Also, when I referred to remote  
base I was referring to a control link. We don’t want people listening to  
the input J I just want simple.

Can RC-210’s be resold?

> **···**
>
> * * *
> 
> **From:** Tim Sawyer  
> [[mailto:tim.sawyer@mac.com](mailto:tim.sawyer@mac.com)]  
> **Sent:** Saturday, April 12, 2014  
> 7:51 AM  
> **To:** Wayne  
> **Cc:** app\_rpt mailing list  
> **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users]  
> External Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> I forgot to address your remote base requirement. RTCMs do not support  
> remote bases. You will need a computer and URI where the remote base is. But  
> check to see if you radio is supported. Allstar doesn’t support many.
> 
> –
> 
> Tim
> 
> :wq
> 
> On Apr 12, 2014, at 7:37 AM, Tim Sawyer [tim.sawyer@mac.com](mailto:tim.sawyer@mac.com) wrote:
> 
> So the way a voter a voter works is it samples the noise (like squelch  
> does) on each receiver and then takes the signal with the least noise and sends  
> it to the transmitter. If you have a controller in front of the RTCM the  
> controller will always be sending the receiver to the transmitter even if the  
> signal has noise.
> 
> RTCMs are just smart IO devices. Think of them as not being much  
> different than a sound FOB on the end of an ethernet cable. Generally, with  
> RTCMs, the computer will be at some central location on the ground and the  
> RTCMs will be far away on a high hill or tower.
> 
> In your case, because your IP network is only between your two hills,  
> the computer will be at one site or the other. So wherever the computer is  
> located, is where you would connect in your IRLP box with a URI or other sound  
> FOB. Echolink could be on that same (or a different) box. Echolink is a app  
> that runs on the Allstar computer no sound FOB or URI required.
> 
> It really comes down to this: you either use Allstar or you  
> don’t. The other issue you’ve not touched on yet it touch tone  
> commands. Trying to work out a scheme where the RC-210 commands and the Allstar  
> commands don’t conflict is difficult and confusing for your users.
> 
> My recommendation is to save the RC-210s for another project. Put  
> RTCM’s on your three hills connected directly to the repeaters. Put the  
> Allstar computer on the ground on your IP network. Get 5 Allstar nodes: Use one  
> node for the voting system of Site 1 and 2. Use another node for site 3. Use a  
> node for the IRLP URI. Use a node for Echolink. That way you have the most  
> flexibility while using the lease amount of hardware and having a clean TT  
> command structure.
> 
> –
> 
> Tim
> 
> :wq
> 
> On Apr 12, 2014, at 4:53 AM, Wayne [wayne@anywherehost.net](mailto:wayne@anywherehost.net) wrote:
> 
> One more thought, if I may. How do voted  
> systems bring in IRLP or EchoLink? Aren’t we talking about something  
> similar? I’m really bummed now.
> 
> * * *
> 
> **From:** KJ6KO [[mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com](mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com)]  
> **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 9:57 PM  
> **To:** Wayne  
> **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External  
> Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> Well, I don’t know how much help I can be here. I  
> don’t use voting, don’t like it, never will, but that’s me. Trying to  
> combine a voted system of RTCM’s into a regular RF link may be  
> interesting. Not sure how the RTCM will react to a “link” input  
> as it is used to discriminator input as far as know.
> 
> There are people more familiar with RTCM’s voting and  
> simulcasting than I am that may be able to help you.
> 
> I use URI’s and have just connected them directly to  
> controller ports, like you would a link radio, and they work and sound  
> great! I have even used them as the controller and sound even better!
> 
> Sorry I can’t be much more help than that!
> 
> good luck and 73 de Greg
> 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > **From:** Wayne
> 
> > **To:** ‘app\_rpt  
> > mailing list’
> 
> > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 8:05 PM
> 
> > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External  
> > Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > Hi Greg,
> 
> > Thank you for taking the time to reply.
> 
> > Our operational goal is a hybrid system  
> > that is voted and simulcast between two repeaters 100 miles apart but  
> > overlapping input coverage. They have no LOS. Site 1 and 2 are on a VLAN  
> > provided by the site vendor but Site 3 only has wireless internet. We will be  
> > using a RF link. We don’t want to use the public internet.
> 
> > Each location will also have a remote base  
> > and a WX receiver with a FIPS code for that area only. Using some switching  
> > logic we will disconnect from Allstar if the WX receiver triggers. No need to  
> > send marine weather alerts to the desert.
> 
> > The topology expected is Site 1 → Site  
> > 2 (Allstar; voted), Site 1 → Site 3 (RF link; different frequency). Since  
> > it isn’t our VLAN we can’t use Ubiquity or similar to link to Site  
> > 3 as an unvoted device. There is also significant overlap of outputs but I sure  
> > would love to be voted and have only one pair. That would be so nice. We  
> > already have RC-210’s so we don’t want to toss them aside and buy  
> > RTCM’s as just controllers as has been suggested. We will end up with  
> > RTCM’s for the voting ($$$) and the RC-210’s for control. Using the  
> > RC-210’s allows us cell phone access to the RC-210’s as well as  
> > through the remote bases.
> 
> > As you probably know the RC-210’s  
> > have a 4th port that  
> > is no frills. The WX receivers can go on this “port”.
> 
> > * * *
> 
> > **From:** KJ6KO [[mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com](mailto:kj6ko@innercite.com)]  
> > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 12:48 PM  
> > **To:** Wayne  
> > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External  
> > Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > Wayne,  
> > I think what we need is to figure out what exactly you are trying to do.
> 
> > If you are running a full simulcast/voted system,  
> > (multiple transmitters, multiple receivers with ALL receivers and transmitters  
> > connected via Allstar) and want a backup RF link, you will need 3 total  
> > ports. 1 for the repeater, 1 for the backup RF link and 1 for  
> > the RTCM. Just treat the RTCM like a “Link Radio” as that is  
> > basically what it is.
> 
> > Since you are new to allstar, I assume that is not  
> > the case.
> 
> > If you are just trying to connect your repeater or repeater  
> > system to Allstar, a RTCM is serious overkill! I would recommend a DMK  
> > URI for 1/4 the price. You can even use it as the controller and  
> > eliminate your current unit! It will still run as a standalone repeater  
> > when offline.
> 
> > Does that help?
> 
> > Let us know what you have and what you would like to do and  
> > we could probably be more help.
> 
> > 73 de Greg KJ6KO
> 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> 
> > > **From:** Wayne
> 
> > > **To:** ‘app\_rpt  
> > > mailing list’
> 
> > > **Sent:** Friday, April 11, 2014 9:48 AM
> 
> > > **Subject:** Re: [App\_rpt-users] External  
> > > Controller Plus Allstar
> 
> > > “…If you  
> > > mean you want to parallel app\_rpt/allstar with a existing hardwired controller,  
> > > you will need to use “DUPLEX=0 & LINKTOLINK=YES” on the primary  
> > > node for that/each location. It will give you the same fullduplex but  
> > > with no hang time etc that you can parallel with existing controller. A port on  
> > > your rc-210 if i remember them correct…”
> 
> > > I sincerely appreciate the answer but as I  
> > > mentioned I am new to Allstar. As such I don’t know how to ask the  
> > > question. I received this reply and appreciate the time it took to write. But I  
> > > wonder if another user can offer insight into wiring. Do I wire the Allstar  
> > > device to Port 1 and then the repeater to port 2? Do I keep the option of voted  
> > > simulcast? Doing so only leaves one port remaining. Am I missing something in  
> > > the translation here? Thank you. I appreciate your time.
> 
> > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > > database 9666 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > 
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > 
> > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > > * * *
> 
> > > * * *
> > > 
> > > App\_rpt-users mailing list
> > > 
> > > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)
> > > 
> > > [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > > 
> > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to the bottom of the  
> > > page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options  
> > > button”
> > > 
> > > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email  
> > > confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the  
> > > list detailing the problem.
> > > 
> > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > > database 9666 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > > 
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > 
> > > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > database 9667 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> > * * *
> 
> > * * *
> > 
> > App\_rpt-users mailing list
> > 
> > [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)
> > 
> > [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this list please visit [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to the bottom of the  
> > page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options  
> > button”
> > 
> > You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email  
> > confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the  
> > list detailing the problem.
> > 
> > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> > database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature  
> database 9668 (20140411) \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> [http://www.eset.com](http://www.eset.com/)
> 
> * * *
> 
> App\_rpt-users mailing list
> 
> [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)
> 
> [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> 
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to the bottom of the  
> page. Enter your email address and press the “Unsubscribe or edit options  
> button”
> 
> You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email  
> confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the  
> list detailing the problem.
> 
> * * *
> 
> App\_rpt-users mailing list
> 
> [App\_rpt-users@ohnosec.org](mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org)
> 
> [http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app\_rpt-users](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users)
> 
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit  
> [ohnosec.org](http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users) and scroll down to  
> the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the  
> “Unsubscribe or edit options button”
> 
> You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email  
> confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the  
> list detailing the problem.
